One thing to consider is that this kind of strategy consigns any Republican nominee to a situation in which they have to run the table on a half dozen competitive state races in order to win the barest of majorities. If they lose even one race, they will lose. And, if they win, they will win by the skin of their teeth with almost half of the country opposed to them.
I'd add that any strategy that depends on winning Pennsylvania and Wisconsin is pretty close to hopeless. Pennsylvania was last won by a Republican in 1988 and Wisconsin was last won by a Republican in 1984. Even Iowa is problematic. Bush won it in 2004, but that is the only time since 1984 that Republicans have carried the state.
However, it doesn't seem like the Republican House majority is thinking at all about presidential elections as they consider what to do about immigration reform. This places the Democrats in the catbird's seat. The Democrats will be almost assured of winning the presidency in 2016 if the House refuses to pass a comprehensive bill. Yet, their chances won't really be dimmed if the House agrees to reform. That's because, as it stands, the Republicans have only the narrowest of chances of winning the Electoral College regardless of what they do.
Still to have a fighting chance, they need to keep as many states in play as possible, and the only way to do that is to pass immigration reform.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/boomantribune/Svpw/~3/dYTeVgSccKM/09775
The Wolf of Wall Street marilyn monroe MAC Cosmetics The Voice Results Miss USA 2013 Daytime Emmy Awards 2013 Danielle Bradbery
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.